Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1979

United Services Automobile Ass'n v. Noell

United Services Automobile Ass'n v. Noell
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided June 19, 1979 · Haverfield, Pearson, Schwartz
372 So. 2d 504; 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15367 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)
United Services Automobile Ass'n v. Noell

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Defendants, United Services Automobile Association and its insureds, Herman and Laurie Graulich, appeal an order denying their motion to tax costs.

Barry Noell was injured in an automobile collision which resulted from the negligence of Herman Graulich. Noell filed suit against Graulich, his wife, Laurie, and their liability insurer, U.S.A.A. Thereafter, U.S. A.A. submitted an offer of judgment for $3,001.00 plus legally taxable costs. Noell refused the offer and the cause was tried by a jury which returned the following verdict:

Scanned image of a quoted passage in this opinion. The text of this passage is not available in machine-readable form.
“WE, THE JURY, find in favor of the Plaintiff, BARRY K. NOELL, and against the Defendants, HERMAN GRAULICH and LAURIE GRAULICH, and assess his damages at $7,680 -5.000 $2,680
“SO SAY WE ALL.
/s/ Armando J. Olivera ARMANDO J. OLIVERA, Foreman
“DATED: SEPTEMBER 29, 1978”
Scanned image of a quoted passage in this opinion. The text of this passage is not available in machine-readable form.

A final judgment for $2,680 was entered for Noell. Thereupon, U.S.A.A. filed a motion to tax costs against Noell pursuant to Fla. R.Civ.P. 1.442 on the ground that the offer of judgment was more than the judgment awarded to Noell. Noell also moved to tax costs against the Graulichs and U.S.A.A. The trial judge then heard the respective motions to tax costs and entered an order taxing costs against U.S.A.A. and the Grau-lichs on the ground that the unreduced jury verdict ($7,680) exceeded the $3,001 offer of judgment. U.S.A.A. and the Graulichs appeal therefrom. We reverse.

Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.442 clearly provides “if the judgment finally obtained by the adverse party is not more favorable than the offer, he must pay the costs incurred after the making of the offer.” [Emphasis supplied]. The final judgment obtained by Noell was $2,680. That amount being less than the unconditional offer of judgment of $3,001.00, it was error to tax costs against U.S.A.A. and the Graulichs. Pursuant to Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.442 Noell must pay the costs incurred after the making of the offer.

Reversed and remanded.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.