Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1979

Estes v. Estes

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided August 16, 1979 · Mills, Shivers, Smith

373 So. 2d 965; 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15407 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Anderson v. Anderson (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)
Marrero v. Marrero (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Although both counsel were at fault in not filing financial affidavits of their clients before the scheduled hearing on child support, the record as reconstituted shows that appellant’s counsel did object to the court ruling on the child support issue on the basis of financial affidavits yet to be filed, concerning which counsel had no opportunity to cross-examine. Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.611. It does not appear that other evidence sufficient to justify the support award was adduced regularly before the court. See Hagin v. Hagin, 353 So.2d 949 (Fla.2d DCA 1978).

REVERSED.

MILLS, C. J. and ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., and SHIVERS, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.