The revocation of appellants’ probation is affirmed, but we remand for deletion of the finding that appellant Brooks violated the condition requiring payment of costs of supervision from the order revoking his probation. Appellant Brooks did not admit this violation, and there was no evidence to show that appellant was able to pay the costs. Coxon v. State, 365 So.2d 1067 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979).