Thomas v. State
Thomas v. State
380 So. 2d 466; 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16019
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Thomas v. State
070rehearing
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
Petition for rehearing is denied.
HERSEY and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concúr.
BERANEK, J., concurs specially, with opinion.
Concurring Opinion
specially concurring.
I concur in the denial of the motion for rehearing because I believe appellant did not present a timely request for a jury instruction on maximum and minimum penalties. I therefore believe the issue of the adequacy of the instructions given was not properly preserved for review.
Opinion of the Court
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.