Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1980

Murray v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided April 2, 1980 · Campbell, Ott, Scheb

382 So. 2d 765; 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 15864 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

6 later published cases cite this decision.

Christy v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)
Upshaw v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)
Glenn v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)
GDW v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)
G. D. W. v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)
State v. Johnson (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Section 39.111(6)(d), Florida Statutes (1979), requires that a trial court, when imposing adult sanctions on a juvenile convicted of a crime, make findings of fact and set forth reasons showing those sanctions to be in conformity with the criteria of Section 39.111(6)(c). The record here reveals that the trial judge failed to refer to all of the six criteria mentioned in that section when he sentenced appellant.

We affirm, the judgment of the trial court, but vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing pursuant to Section 39.-111(6). See Proctor v. State, 373 So.2d 450 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979); Johnson v. State, 371 So.2d 556 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979).

SCHEB, Acting C. J., and OTT and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.