The order of January 28,1980, is reversed except insofar as it denied the wife’s motion to hold the husband in contempt, which was the only matter noticed for the later-expanded “emergency” hearing which gave rise to the order. Neither party, who each respectively complains about unfavorable provisions of the order, was given fair notice or a reasonable opportunity to be heard concerning any other issue. Barreiro v. Barreiro, 377 So.2d 999 (Fla.3d DCA 1979), and cases cited.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part.