Stuart v. State
Stuart v. State
389 So. 2d 4; 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 23189
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Stuart v. State
Opinion of the Court
The appellant’s judgment of conviction is reversed with directions to discharge him from custody. Because of the reasons and authorities stated in Royer v. State, 389 So.2d 1007 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980( (en banc) and State v. Frost, 374 So.2d 593 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), we find the trial court erroneously denied appellant’s motion to suppress the physical evidence.
Reversed with directions.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.