Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1980

Alimenta (U.S.A.), Inc. v. Pender Peanut Co.

Alimenta (U.S.A.), Inc. v. Pender Peanut Co.
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided October 17, 1980 · Joanos, Liles, Wentworth, Woodie
389 So. 2d 7; 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17808 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Alimenta (U.S.A.), Inc. v. Pender Peanut Co.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Sua sponte, this Court dismisses the appeal on the ground that it was untimely filed. The order appealed from is an order denying Appellant’s motion to dismiss for *8improper venue. Such an order is interlocutory, and a motion to reconsider its entry is not authorized by Florida Rules of Civil Procedure 1.530(a). Thus, the filing and pendency of a motion for reconsideration does not toll the time for taking an appeal. “M ” Enterprises, Inc. v. Baumgartner, 362 So.2d 282 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978).

WENTWORTH and JOANOS, JJ., and LILES, WOODIE A., Associate Judge (Retired), concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑