Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1980

Gosman v. State

Gosman v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided December 17, 1980 · Anstead, Beranek, Hurley
391 So. 2d 339; 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17873 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Gosman v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by defendant from a judgment after a jury trial.' Defendant was found guilty of resisting arrest with violence and placed on three years’ probation. We affirm in all respects except conclude that the condition of probation whereby defendant was required to submit to searches by any authorized police officer is violative of the principles stated in Dearth v. State, 390 So.2d 108 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980). We, therefore, strike the words, “and authorized police officers,” from the order and affirm the order as modified.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.

ANSTEAD and HURLEY, JJ., concur. BERANEK, J., dissents with opinion.

Dissenting Opinion

BERANEK, Judge,

dissenting:

I respectfully dissent. I recognize that the Dearth case is controlling here but do not agree with the principles stated therein.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.