Freundlich v. South Seas Operating Corp.
Cases that cite this one
7 later published cases cite this decision.
- Simkins v. Bank of Nova Scotia (Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands 2025)
- Del Rio v. City of Hialeah (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)
- Schupbach v. City of Sarasota (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
- Mininson v. Allright Miami, Inc. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
- Jones v. Charles (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)
- Young v. Surfside Bootery, Inc. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)
- Gold v. B. D. W. Corp. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Murray FREUNDLICH, Appellant,
v.
SOUTH SEAS OPERATING CORPORATION, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Joseph J. Glazer and David W. Singer, Hallandale, for appellant.
Leland E. Stansell, Jr., and Douglas A. McDuff, Miami, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, DANIEL S. PEARSON, and FERGUSON, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
An adjoining property owner has no duty to maintain a public sidewalk. Cantens v. Jeff-Son, Inc., 381 So.2d 307 (Fla.3d DCA 1980), Beattie v. City of Coral Gables, 358 So.2d 1131 (Fla.3d DCA 1978). Upon examination of the record and briefs there appears no genuine issue of material fact and defendant-appellee is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla. 1966).
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.