Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1981

Northern v. State

Northern v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided February 24, 1981 · Ferguson, Hubbart, Pearson
394 So. 2d 522; 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19564 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Northern v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. The prosecutor’s closing argument comments, which the jury was properly instructed to disregard, were not so per*523nicious, in the context of this case, as to require that the defendant be granted a new trial. See Darden v. State, 329 So.2d 287 (Fla. 1976), cert. dismissed, 430 U.S. 704, 97 S.Ct. 1671, 51 L.Ed.2d 751 (1977); Thomas v. State, 326 So.2d 413 (Fla. 1976); Zamot v. State, 375 So.2d 881 (Fla.3d DCA 1979); Johnson v. State, 348 So.2d 646 (Fla.3d DCA 1977); James v. State, 334 So.2d 83 (Fla.3d DCA 1976).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.