Thomas v. State
Thomas v. State
394 So. 2d 1039; 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19584
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Thomas v. State
Opinion of the Court
The trial court erred in not complying with Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.390(a). See Tascano v. State, 393 So.2d 540 (Fla. 1980). By objection to the trial court’s denial of the requested instruction, appellant properly preserved this point for review. We have considered the remaining points raised by appellant and find them to be without merit.
Reversed for new trial.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.