We affirm on the grounds that the evidence of appellant’s use of a firearm in the commission of a criminal offense properly went to the jury; Styles v. State, 384 So.2d 703 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980); Machado v. State, 363 So.2d 1132 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978), cert. denied, 373 So.2d 459 (Fla. 1979); Warren v. State, 332 So.2d 361 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); and that the state’s identification testimony properly survived appellant’s motion for judgment of acquittal. Zuberi v. State, 343 So.2d 664 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 354 So.2d 988 (Fla. 1977).

Affirmed.