Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1981

Crown Trading Co. v. Systems for Security, Inc.

Crown Trading Co. v. Systems for Security, Inc.
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided June 16, 1981 · Bas, Hendry, Kin, Nesbitt
400 So. 2d 110; 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20189 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Crown Trading Co. v. Systems for Security, Inc.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We reverse on the ground that dismissal of the suit for failure of plaintiff’s counsel to proceed with trial at the scheduled time imposes too harsh a penalty upon the litigant where said counsel moved for a continuance on the basis of a conflicting trial, and the record lacks any evidence showing a willful or blatant disregard for the court’s authority. The court may, of course, discipline the offending attorney by contempt or other appropriate punishment. Catogas v. Sapp, 397 So.2d 1182 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Alter v. Editorial Planeta, S.A., 389 So.2d 321 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).

Reversed and remanded.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.