Shamas v. Bundy
Shamas v. Bundy
401 So. 2d 1161; 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20802
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Shamas v. Bundy
Opinion of the Court
We agree with the trial court’s ruling granting a motion for involuntary dismissal at the conclusion of the opponents’ case on the ground that they had failed to make a prima facie showing that the challenged will had been procured by undue influence. See, Heasley v. Evans, 104 So.2d 854, 857 (Fla.2d DCA 1958); see generally, In re Estate of Carpenter, 253 So.2d 697 (Fla. 1971).
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.