Lee v. State
Lee v. State
Opinion of the Court
Appellant, Lee, appeals the denial of his motion to suppress evidence. He was charged by information with possession of cannabis, possession of methaqualone, possession of paraphernalia and possession of phentermine. His motion to suppress was granted as to the paraphernalia but denied as to the rest of the evidence. Lee pled nolo contendere reserving the right to appeal. He was adjudicated guilty and sentenced to serve one year in jail as a condition of five (5) years probation. The written judgment states that Lee entered a plea of guilty.
We find no error in the denial of the motion to suppress. The evidence seized
AFFIRMED AS AMENDED.
. Ensor v. State, No. 57,817 (Fla. June 4, 1981).
. United States v. Chadwick, 433 U.S. 1, 97 S.ct. 2476, 53 L.Ed.2d 538 (1977); Cardwell v. Lewis, 417 U.S. 583, 94 S.Ct. 2464, 41 L.Ed.2d 325 (1974).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.