Bathurst v. Bathurst
Bathurst v. Bathurst
402 So. 2d 1360; 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20947
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Bathurst v. Bathurst
Opinion of the Court
We affirm the trial court’s combined award of lump sum and periodic rehabilitative alimony only because appellant/wife, who has a marketable skill, retains the ability to seek a continuation of rehabilitative alimony, or to seek conversion to permanent alimony, if she is later able to demonstrate an inability to become self-supporting.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.