Bathurst v. Bathurst
Bathurst v. Bathurst
402 So. 2d 1360; 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20947
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Opinion of the Court
We affirm the trial court’s combined award of lump sum and periodic rehabilitative alimony only because appellant/wife, who has a marketable skill, retains the ability to seek a continuation of rehabilitative alimony, or to seek conversion to permanent alimony, if she is later able to demonstrate an inability to become self-supporting.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.