Carter v. State
Carter v. State
403 So. 2d 582; 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21052
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Carter v. State
Opinion of the Court
Appellant was convicted of burglary. At trial he requested the court to instruct the jury as to the maximum and minimum sentences which could be imposed upon conviction. The court’s denial of that request was error, Tascano v. State, 393 So.2d 540 (Fla. 1980), requiring that we reverse the judgment and remand this cause to the trial court for a new trial. This disposition of the case makes it unnecessary to reach the other issues raised on appeal.
REVERSED AND REMANDED FOR A NEW TRIAL.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.