Hass v. State
Hass v. State
405 So. 2d 1368; 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21685
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Hass v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm appellant’s conviction. It appears, however, that appellant has been denied access to the factual portions of the presentence investigation report. This report is not part of the record on appeal and we therefore are unable to determine whether disclosure will have an impact on sentencing. We none-the-less are required to vacate the sentence and remand for compliance with Rule 3.713(b), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, and for resentencing.
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND REMANDED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.