Fasenmyer v. State
Fasenmyer v. State
413 So. 2d 33; 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21184
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Fasenmyer v. State
Opinion of the Court
Upon our review of the complete record of appellant’s conviction for breaking and entering, we find insufficient admissible evidence of a breaking and that the highest offense sustained by the record on that charge is that of entering without breaking with intent to commit a felony. No error affects appellant’s other convictions. The breaking and entering judgment is therefore REVERSED and the case is REMANDED for entry of an appropriate judgment and for resentencing.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.