Ramos v. State
Ramos v. State
429 So. 2d 318; 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 28247
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Ramos v. State
Opinion of the Court
Appellant’s conviction and sentence are affirmed, there being no error in the trial' court’s denial of his motion to suppress. However, appellant’s fingerprints are not affixed to the order constituting the judgment and sentence as required by section 921.241, Florida Statutes (1979). That order is therefore vacated and the cause remanded for entry of a proper judgment.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.