Pacheco v. Lincoln Palace Condominium, Inc.
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- In re Kendall Lake Towers Condominium Ass'n, Inc. (United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District Florida 2017)
- Maillard v. Dowdell (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)
- Pearlman v. LAKE DORA VILLAS MAMT., INC. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)
- Turnberry Towers Corp. v. Mechoulam (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Doris PACHECO and Dulce Marie Pujol, Appellants,
v.
LINCOLN PALACE CONDOMINIUM, INC., Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
*574 Robert H. Burns, Miami Beach, and Donald Mates, Hollywood, John A. Murray, Miami, for appellants.
Wolfson & Diamond and J. William Kirkland, Miami Beach, for appellee.
Before HENDRY, BASKIN and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Because appellant Pacheco was a potential purchaser and not a unit owner, and this is not an action between unit owners and/or their condominium association for breach of statutory or contractual provisions governing such associations, we reverse the attorney's fee award on behalf of Lincoln Palace. § 718.303(1), Fla. Stat. See Saul v. Basse, 399 So.2d 130 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981); The Fountains of Palm Beach Condominium, Inc. v. Farkas, 355 So.2d 163 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978).
The remainder of the summary final judgment is affirmed on the ground that the association properly refused to approve Pacheco's application based upon the restrictive covenant of the condominium bylaws prohibiting children under the age of twelve. White Egret Condominium, Inc. v. Franklin, 379 So.2d 346 (Fla. 1979).
Affirmed in part; reversed in part.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.