Blum v. Merrill Stevens Dry Dock Co.
Cases that cite this one
11 later published cases cite this decision.
- Carlisle v. District Board of Trustees (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)
- Golden Door Jewelry Creations, Inc. v. Lloyds Underwriters (United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida 1991)
- Wabash Power Equipment Co. v. Zalkin (Florida Circuit Courts 1989)
- Faircloth v. Paromila E. (In re International Gold Bullion Exchange, Inc.) (United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District Florida 1986)
- Faircloth v. Paul (In re International Gold Bullion Exchange, Inc.) (United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District Florida 1986)
- Faircloth v. Bouchard (In re the International Gold Bullion Exchange, Inc.) (United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District Florida 1985)
- Faircloth v. Clarke (In re International Gold Bullion Exchange, Inc.) (United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District Florida 1985)
- Faircloth v. Lawson (In re International Gold Bullion Exchange, Inc.) (United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District Florida 1985)
- Faircloth v. Martin (In re International Gold Bullion Exchange, Inc.) (United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District Florida 1985)
- Faircloth v. Giorgetti (In re the International Gold Bullion Exchange, Inc.) (United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District Florida 1985)
- Puritan Insurance Company v. Butler Aviation-Palm Beach, Inc. (11th Cir. 1983)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Marvin BLUM for the Use and Benefit of Insurance Company of North America, Appellant,
v.
MERRILL STEVENS DRY DOCK COMPANY, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
*193 Lane, Mitchell & Harris and David R. Canning, Miami, for appellant.
Smathers & Thompson and G. Morton Good, Miami, for appellee.
Before HENDRY, NESBITT and FERGUSON, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
On the evidence presented, the trial court properly found that, at the time of the disappearance of the vessel, there was no contract of bailment because there was no completed delivery of possession, custody, or control. Florida Small Business Corporation v. Miami Shipyards Corporation, 175 So.2d 46 (Fla.3d DCA 1965); Stegemann v. Miami Beach Boat Slips, Inc., 213 F.2d 561, 565 (5th Cir. 1954); cf., Empire Tool Company v. Wells, 227 So.2d 76 (Fla. 4th DCA 1969).
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.