Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1982

DEPARTMENT OF H & R SERV. v. Miller

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided April 8, 1982 · Per Curiam

413 So. 2d 96 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

7 later published cases cite this decision.

Keck v. Eminisor (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)
Miller v. State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)
SARASOTA COUNTY v. VENICE HMA, LLC, D/B/A VENICE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER AND SARASOTA DOCTORS HOSPITAL, INC. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Citizens Property Insurance Corp. v. San Perdido Ass'n (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)
Miami-Dade County v. Miller (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)
Miami-Dade County v. Fente (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)
McCall v. DEPT. OF HEALTH & REHAB. SERV. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

413 So.2d 96 (1982)

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, Petitioner,
v.
Stephen P. MILLER, Respondent.

No. AJ-272.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 8, 1982.

Roy L. Glass of DeSerio & Glass, St. Petersburg, for petitioner.

Ronald H. Schnell of Carr & Schnell, St. Petersburg, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

In this petition for writ of certiorari, petitioner alleges that the trial court erred by: (1) denying petitioner's motion for summary judgment on the basis of sovereign immunity; and (2) ordering the petitioner to produce certain specified information respecting the assaultive tendencies of one who was under petitioner's care.

This court has entertained petitions for writs of certiorari to review interlocutory orders determining issues of sovereign immunity. However, in the instant case, it appears that there may be factual matters which remain to be developed at trial bearing on the issue of sovereign immunity.^[1] We, therefore, decline to issue the writ, without prejudice to petitioner's right to raise the issue of sovereign immunity on appeal from final judgment.

As to the second point raised, the petition for writ of certiorari is denied, there being no departure from the essential requirements of law.

ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., C.J., and McCORD and BOOTH, JJ., concur.

NOTES

[1] Bellavance v. State, 390 So.2d 422 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980), petition for review denied, 399 So.2d 1145 (Fla. 1981).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.