Perkins v. FLORIDA PAROLE & PROBATION
Cases that cite this one
7 later published cases cite this decision.
- Rolle v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)
- Lamar v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)
- Fuller v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)
- Clapp v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)
- Griggs v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)
- Grandin v. Parole & Probation Commission (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)
- Cook v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Paul S. PERKINS, Appellant,
v.
FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Paul S. Perkins, pro se.
Malcolm S. Greenfield, Tallahassee, for appellee.
MILLS, Judge.
Perkins appeals the establishment of his presumptive parole release date. We affirm.
The aggravation for multiple offenses with concurrent sentences is proper under Rule 23-19.01(5), Florida Administrative Code. The aggravation in each case was within the matrix guidelines for each offense.
No abuse of discretion is shown in the appellee's assigning an offense characteristic of "moderate" for possession of a knife during incarceration.
The appellee provided a written explanation for its deviation from the examiner's recommendation.
McCORD and SHIVERS, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.