Matthews v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Matthews v. State, 408 So. 2d 781 (1982)
1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 18980
Boardman, Hobson, Ott

Matthews v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed, but the case is remanded for resen-tencing. The sentence incorrectly failed to provide the period of credit time to be allowed appellant as required by section 921.-161(1), Florida Statutes (1979). Shemwell v. State, 391 So.2d 218 (Fla.2d DCA 1980). Appellant need not be present at resentenc-ing.

HOBSON, A.C.J., and BOARDMAN and OTT, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Raymond A. MATTHEWS v. STATE of Florida
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published