Dealto v. Keating ex rel. Ninth Judicial Circuit of the State of Florida

Florida District Courts of Appeal February 10, 1982

Dealto v. Keating ex rel. Ninth Judicial Circuit of the State of Florida, 409 So. 2d 527 (1982)

1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19231

Church, Frank, Orfinger, Sharp

Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER

SHARP, Judge.

Petitioner’s motion for reconsideration of our denial of his petition for writ of prohibition was timely filed, and because the issue therein sought to be raised may again be argued to this court in an appeal or interlocutory appeal, we hereby clarify our original denial of the petition as follows: We deny the petition for writ of prohibition because of lack of jurisdiction. The possible violation of section 901.25(3), Florida Statutes (1981), does not deprive the lower court of its power to. act in the case, and therefore prohibition is not an appropriate remedy.

ORFINGER and FRANK D. UP-CHURCH, Jr., JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name: Emil Albert DEALTO v. The Honorable Richard B. KEATING, as Circuit Judge, In and For the Ninth Judicial Circuit of the State of Florida, Orange County, Florida
Cited By: 1 case
Status: Published