Forbes v. Stefan

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Forbes v. Stefan, 410 So. 2d 575 (1982)
1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19289
Baskin, Hendry, Hubbart

Forbes v. Stefan

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Appellants failed to sustain their burden of proof to establish that venue of the action brought against them on an unsecured promissory note was improper, Davis v. Dempsey, 343 So.2d 950 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); failed to demonstrate the existence of genuine issues of material fact, Reflex N. V. v. UMET Trust, 336 So.2d 473 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); and failed to show gross abuse of discretion by the trial court in denying a continuance, Edwards v. Pratt, 335 So.2d 597 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976).

Affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
Allen FORBES and A. D. Griffen, Sr. v. Joseph STEFAN
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published