Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1982

Forbes v. Stefan

Forbes v. Stefan
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided February 16, 1982 · Baskin, Hendry, Hubbart
410 So. 2d 575; 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19289 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Forbes v. Stefan

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Appellants failed to sustain their burden of proof to establish that venue of the action brought against them on an unsecured promissory note was improper, Davis v. Dempsey, 343 So.2d 950 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); failed to demonstrate the existence of genuine issues of material fact, Reflex N. V. v. UMET Trust, 336 So.2d 473 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); and failed to show gross abuse of discretion by the trial court in denying a continuance, Edwards v. Pratt, 335 So.2d 597 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976).

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.