Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1982

Stock v. Stock

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided March 9, 1982 · Barkdull, Ferguson, Pearson

410 So. 2d 659; 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19417 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Williamson v. Williamson (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was served by constructive service of process by publication in a marriage dissolution proceeding. She filed certain defensive motions, including a motion *660for extension of time to respond to the original petition. All motions were denied, except she was granted 30 additional days to respond. She failed to file a response or answer or secure another extension in the additional thirty-day period. A default was duly entered, followed by final judgment of dissolution that only dissolved the marriage and fixed no property rights or alimony, etc.

We find no error and affirm. Gelkop v. Gelkop, 384 So.2d 195 (Fla.3d DCA 1980); Stevenson v. Arnold, 250 So.2d 270 (Fla. 1971).

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.