Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1982

Crispin v. Crispin

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided February 9, 1982 · Jorgenson, Nesbitt, Pearson

411 So. 2d 218; 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19194 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

McIntosh v. McIntosh (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)
Sea Fresh Frozen Products, Inc. v. Abdin (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

From the record presented for review, we conclude that reasonable persons could differ as to the propriety of the action taken by the trial court and, therefore, cannot find that the trial court abused its discretion. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 1980). Additionally, contrary to appellant’s contention, the trial court did not, ipso facto, abuse its discretion by awarding attorneys’ fees in an amount less than the expert testimony offered by the appellant, notwithstanding that appellee offered no opposing expert testimony on that issue. Fatoiitis v. Fatolitis, 271 So.2d 227 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973).

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.