Malone v. Meadow

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Malone v. Meadow, 411 So. 2d 263 (1982)
1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19397
Smith, Thompson, Wigginton

Malone v. Meadow

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

There is no error in the judgment that Malone is guilty of indirect criminal contempt. The appropriate fine for such an offense cannot exceed $500, however, and the fine here is excessive by $250. Section 775.02, Florida Statutes (1979); Aaron v. State, 284 So.2d 673 (Fla. 1973). Nor are the restrictions on Malone’s right of access to the courts through self-representation sustainable as in Shotkin v. Cohen, 163 So.2d 330 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964). The sentence to that extent is VACATED, but otherwise the judgment and sentence are AFFIRMED.

ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., C. J., and THOMPSON and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Sally MALONE v. Theodore B. MEADOW, Appellee Sally MALONE v. Larry A. BODIFORD, Circuit Judge for Gulf County
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published