Fruit Circus, Inc. v. Zalis
Fruit Circus, Inc. v. Zalis
411 So. 2d 956; 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19566
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Fruit Circus, Inc. v. Zalis
Opinion of the Court
There is no error in the order of the deputy commissioner except for the reservation of jurisdiction to consider the value of a company car as part of the average weekly wage. The claimant did not carry his burden of establishing this inclusion. Therefore, the phrase “but may be considered at a later time” is stricken from the penultimate sentence of paragraph 5.
As modified the order is AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.