Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1982

Grapin & Chaykin, M.D., P.A. v. Turnoff & Fox, M.D., P.A.

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided April 27, 1982 · Genson, Jor, Nesbitt, Schwartz

413 So. 2d 133; 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19918 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

6 later published cases cite this decision.

Grapin & Chaykin, M.D., P.A. v. Turnoff & Fox, M.D., P.A. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)
CCI v. America II Electronics, Inc. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)
Department of Children and Families v. RH (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
Holderman v. Lobrano (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)
Paramount Advisors, Inc. v. Schwartz (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
Champagne-Webber-Anderson, Inc. v. Blanchard Machinery, Inc. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The trial court order adjudging plaintiffs in contempt of court and ordering them to *134pay to the defendants the sum of $250 per day for each and every day they remained in violation of orders requiring them to make discovery, is void for the failure of the order to contain findings that the alleged contemnors had the present ability to comply with the underlying discovery orders. Garo v. Garo, 347 So.2d 418 (Fla. 1977); Epstein v. Epstein, 345 So.2d 398 (Fla.3d DCA 1977).

Reversed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.