Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1982

Rolle v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided July 7, 1982 · Anstead, Downey, Hersey

416 So. 2d 51; 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28726 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Fulmore v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)
Beatty v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)
Moore v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

A police officer testified at appellant’s trial that he placed appellant’s photograph in a photographic display for viewing by the alleged victim only after receiving certain undisclosed information from an undisclosed source. The victim then selected appellant’s photograph from the display. We believe the officer’s testimony constituted improper hearsay. Postell v. State, 398 So.2d 851 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Molina v. State, 406 So.2d 57 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). However we do not find a sufficient objection by appellant to preserve this error for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm.

AFFIRMED.

DOWNEY, ANSTEAD and HERSEY, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.