Harris v. Soules
Harris v. Soules
416 So. 2d 1186; 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20414
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Harris v. Soules
Opinion of the Court
The trial court properly found that appellant failed to adduce competent evidence of a boundary dispute or uncertainty by the parties or their predecessors which was resolved by establishing a boundary through agreement or acquiescence. See King v. Carden, 237 So.2d 26 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970). The order granting judgment notwithstanding the jury’s verdict is
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.