Harris v. Soules

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Harris v. Soules, 416 So. 2d 1186 (1982)
1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20414
Ervin, Shaw, Smith

Harris v. Soules

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The trial court properly found that appellant failed to adduce competent evidence of a boundary dispute or uncertainty by the parties or their predecessors which was resolved by establishing a boundary through agreement or acquiescence. See King v. Carden, 237 So.2d 26 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970). The order granting judgment notwithstanding the jury’s verdict is

AFFIRMED.

ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., C. J., and ERVIN and SHAW, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Sarah HARRIS v. Edgar A. SOULES and Leona Soules
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published