Alderman v. State
Alderman v. State
417 So. 2d 699; 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20430
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Alderman v. State
Opinion of the Court
Appellant Alderman’s single general sentence for two separate offenses is improper, Dorfman v. State, 351 So.2d 954 (Fla. 1977), and is therefore vacated and remanded to the trial court with directions to enter a separate sentence for each offense. Appellant need not be present at resentencing.
Appellant’s remaining arguments being without merit, the judgment and sentence is otherwise affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.