Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1982

Horn & Hardart, Florida, Inc. v. Dietz

Horn & Hardart, Florida, Inc. v. Dietz
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided July 14, 1982 · Anstead, Beranek, Dell
417 So. 2d 1039; 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21202 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Horn & Hardart, Florida, Inc. v. Dietz

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

This is a petition for common law certio-rari. We conclude that a departure from the essential requirements of law has been demonstrated, grant the writ, and quash the order below. This case began in County Court and after service upon the defendant, a default occurred due to defense counsel’s failure to appear at a preliminary hearing. The County Court vacated the default finding excusable neglect and a meritorious defense. The Circuit Court reversed the County Court concluding that excusable neglect was not demonstrated as a matter of law. The matters presented to the trial court were essentially factual in nature, and it was up to the trial court (the County Court Judge) to make a determination of excusable neglect. This ruling is a discretionary one, and we conclude that the Circuit Court sitting in its appellate capacity erroneously substituted its judgment for that of the factual finder. The Circuit Court thus exceeded its scope of review.

Certiorari is hereby granted, the order of the Circuit Court quashed, and the matter remanded to the County Court for further proceedings.

BERANEK and DELL, JJ., concur. ANSTEAD, J., dissents without opinion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.