Apopka Greenhouse v. Scott
Apopka Greenhouse v. Scott
Opinion of the Court
We affirm the deputy’s order causally relating claimant’s herniated disc to his industrial accident of September 12, 1979. Although the evidence was capable of disparate interpretations, the deputy’s order determining causality was based on competent and substantial evidence. Further, even though the claimant failed to conduct a work search, the deputy’s order awarding wage loss benefits is sustainable based upon the evidence of claimant’s physical limitations, Dr. Shea’s deposition testi
Accordingly, the order appealed is AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.