Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1982

Hurst v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided August 25, 1982 · Ervin, McCord, Mills

418 So. 2d 444; 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28894 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

May v. Fla. Parole & Probation Com'n (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)
Woulard v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)
Lobo v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s motion to dismiss has been treated as a motion to strike appellee’s answer brief for failure to timely serve it. The action of the Florida Parole and Probation Commission is affirmed. See Britt v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 417 So.2d 1079 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Overfield v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 418 So2d 321 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); and Lopez v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 410 So.2d 1354 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).

McCORD, MILLS and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.