Hurst v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Hurst v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission, 418 So. 2d 444 (1982)
1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28894
Ervin, McCord, Mills

Hurst v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s motion to dismiss has been treated as a motion to strike appellee’s answer brief for failure to timely serve it. The action of the Florida Parole and Probation Commission is affirmed. See Britt v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 417 So.2d 1079 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Overfield v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 418 So2d 321 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); and Lopez v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 410 So.2d 1354 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).

McCORD, MILLS and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Jerry L. HURST v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION
Cited By
3 cases
Status
Published