State v. Gomez
State v. Gomez
419 So. 2d 422; 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21173
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- State v. Del Gaudio (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)
- State v. McCloud (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
We find no abuse of the trial court’s discretion in dismissing the information with prejudice because, as it found, the state’s inexcusably tardy and inadequate compliance with an order requiring a bill of particulars had adversely affected the defendant’s ability to prepare for trial. See and compare, Leeman v. State, 357 So.2d 703 (Fla. 1978) (trial court found no prejudice in non-compliance with order).
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.