Burns v. State
Burns v. State
420 So. 2d 386; 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28582
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Burns v. State
Opinion of the Court
A trial judge’s findings should not be disturbed unless they are unsupported by the evidence. Sired v. State, 399 So.2d 964 (Fla. 1981). In this court, a trial court’s ruling on a Motion to Suppress is clothed with a presumption of correctness, McNamara v. State, 357 So.2d 410 (Fla. 1978), and reasonable inferences favor affirmance of the trial court. See Bova v. State, 392 So.2d 950 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980); Churney v. State, 348 So.2d 395 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977).
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.