Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1982

Hart v. State

Hart v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided August 18, 1982 · Anstead, Beranek, Downey
421 So. 2d 2; 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28122 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Hart v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. We believe the trial court acted correctly in denying the motion to suppress; State v. Richards, 388 So.2d 573 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980), cert. denied 397 So.2d 778 (Fla. 1981), 102 S.Ct. 359; in submitting the issue of constructive possession to the jury; Winchell v. State, 362 So.2d 992 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); in denying the motions to dismiss and suppress; Frisbie v. Collins, 342 U.S. 519, 72 S.Ct. 509, 96 L.Ed. 541 (1952); in instructing the jury on constructive possession; Lacy v. State, 387 So.2d 561 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980); and in upholding the constitutionality of the drug trafficking statute; State v. Benitez, 395 So.2d 514 (Fla. 1981).

*3DOWNEY, ANSTEAD and BERANEK, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.