McGowan v. State
McGowan v. State
421 So. 2d 620; 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21468
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
McGowan v. State
Opinion of the Court
Defendant McGowan has failed to preserve for review
Affirmed.
The record reveals that defense counsel indicated his satisfaction with the instructions to be given by the court.
THE COURT: So first, we get the lesser crimes. All right. ‘Introduction to homicide,’ second sentence, second paragraph, ‘Murder in the first-degree includes the lesser crime of manslaughter.’ ‘The lesser crime of manslaughter.’
[ASSISTANT STATE ATTORNEY]: Okay. Right.
THE COURT: ‘Which is unlawful.’
[ASSISTANT STATE ATTORNEY]: Right, and then going down—
THE COURT: Then, we get down to ‘killing was first-degree or manslaughter.’
We strike murder in the second or first degree, whatever we have changed.
All right. I am satisfied with that under the circumstances.
Now, let’s see—
[ASSISTANT STATE ATTORNEY]: Are you satisfied with that Mr. Meadows?
[DEFENSE COUNSEL]: Yes, sir.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.