City of Alachua v. Matilsky
City of Alachua v. Matilsky
423 So. 2d 451; 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28668
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
City of Alachua v. Matilsky
Opinion of the Court
The trial court correctly held, at the instance of appellee Schmidt, that Alachua’s ordinances annexing certain territory violate the contiguity requirement and other requirements of chapter 171, Florida Statutes. We find it unnecessary to reach, and so do not decide, questions on the cross-appeal concerning the standing of other objectors.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.