Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1982

Robinson v. State

Robinson v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided December 8, 1982 · Joanos, Shaw, Wigginton
423 So. 2d 466; 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21762 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Robinson v. State

Opinion of the Court

WIGGINTON, Judge.

Appellant William Mack Robinson’s motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 does not meet the minimal requirements of the rule for review. For example, the motion does not set forth: (1) the judgment or sentence under attack; (2) whether an appeal from the judgment or sentence was filed and if so, the disposition thereof; (3) whether previous post-conviction relief motions) were filed and if so, how many; or *467(4) a brief statement of supportive facts. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850(a)(b)(c)(e). We affirm the lower court’s denial of the motion, but we do so without prejudice to appellant’s refiling of the motion in proper form. Cowick v. State, 419 So.2d 779 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).

SHAW and JOANOS, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.