(dissenting in part).

In my view the trial court erroneously both refused to excuse a prospective juror for cause and permitted the admission of evidence concerning Johnson’s allegedly bad and violent character during the state’s rebuttal although the matter had not been fairly placed in issue by the defense. Hence, I would reverse for a new trial on the authority of Leon v. State, 396 So.2d 203 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), rev. denied, 407 So.2d 1106 (Fla. 1981), as to the first point, and Bates v. State, 422 So.2d 1033 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982), as to the second.

I do not disagree with the court’s treatment of the sentencing question.

Appellant, defendant below, was convicted of rape and was sentenced to three consecutive terms totaling 249 years. He appeals his conviction and that portion of the sentence wherein the trial court retained jurisdiction over the decision of the Parole Department. We find his arguments regarding his conviction to be without merit and, we, therefore affirm his conviction.

With respect to the trial court’s retention of jurisdiction, however, we believe the case should be remanded.

The transcript indicates the judge failed to retain jurisdiction, but the clerk’s notes and the written order of judgment and sentence indicate the opposite. Accordingly, we remand the case with directions to determine whether the sentencing judge properly retained jurisdiction at the time of sentencing in accordance with Section 947.-16(3), Florida Statutes (1979)1 and Hayes v. State, 400 So.2d 519 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).2 See Robinson v. State, 407 So.2d 1038 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).

Conviction affirmed. Sentence remanded to the trial court for proceedings consistent with this opinion.