Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1982

Turner v. State

Turner v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided December 21, 1982 · Hendry, Jorgenson, Pearson
423 So. 2d 594; 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28612 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Turner v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed upon a holding that (1) the trial court properly denied the motion to suppress based on the totality of the circumstances, see Leon v. State, 410 So.2d 201 (Fla. 3d DCA), petition for review denied, 417 So.2d 329 (Fla. 1982); Collier v. State, 353 So.2d 1219 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); see also Michigan v. Moseley, 423 U.S. 96, 96 S.Ct. 321, 46 L.Ed.2d 313 (1975); (2) the trial court did not unduly restrict cross-examination of certain state witnesses, see Ashley v. State, 370 So.2d 1191 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); and (3) the jury instructions given by the trial court when taken as a whole adequately enabled the jury to consider the theory of defense, see Scott v. State, 396 So.2d 271 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.