Smith v. State
Smith v. State
428 So. 2d 260; 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28704
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Smith v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm Smith’s convictions for burglary and grand theft and his sentences, but we do so without prejudice to his filing a rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief demonstrating that a manifest injustice occurred because of the trial court’s failure to establish a factual basis for his guilty pleas. See Williams v. State, 316 So.2d 267 (Fla. 1975).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.