Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1983

Reinhold Construction, Inc. v. City Council for City of Vero Beach

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided January 26, 1983 · Per Curiam

429 So. 2d 699; 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 19512 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

18 later published cases cite this decision.

Kreager v. Glickman (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)
Florida Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services v. Haire (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
First Miami Securities, Inc. v. Bell (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
Benemerito & Flores, MD's v. Roche (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
Emery v. Clifford (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)
Gold Coast Chemical Corp. v. Goldberg (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)
PCA Life Ins. Co. v. METROPOLITAN-DADE CTY. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)
3299 N. Federal Hwy. v. BROWARD CTY. COM'RS (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)
Jacksonville v. NAEGELE OUTDOOR ADV. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)
I & M Associates, Ltd. v. Henry Sklaver, Inc. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)
State, Department of Administration, Division of Retirement v. Calhoun County (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)
Langford v. Rotech Oxygen & Med. Equip., Inc. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
MID-FLORIDA AT EUSTIS v. Griffin (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)
South Fla. Limo., Inc. v. Broward Cty. Av., Dept. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)
MGK PARTNERS v. Cavallo (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)
Cordis Corp. v. Prooslin (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)
Thompson v. PLANNING COM'N (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)
In re Guardianship of DA McW. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

429 So.2d 699 (1983)

REINHOLD CONSTRUCTION, INC., Appellant,
v.
CITY COUNCIL FOR the CITY OF VERO BEACH, Florida, Appellee.

No. 82-2110.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

January 26, 1983.Rehearing Denied May 5, 1983.

John A. Barley of John A. Barley & Associates, P.A., Tallahassee, for appellant.

Charles P. Vitunac, City Atty., Vero Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Reinhold Construction, Inc. appeals a non-final order denying its amended motion for temporary injunction. We affirm.

Appellant failed to establish that it had a clear legal right to the relief requested, one of the essential requirements before a temporary injunction may be granted. Playpen South, Inc. v. City of Oakland Park, 396 So.2d 830 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981). The trial court found that appellant did not meet the clear legal right test because appellant had no substantial likelihood of success on the merits. The trial court's ruling on a motion for injunction comes to this Court with a presumption of correctness and will be reversed only upon a showing of a clear abuse of discretion or a clearly improper ruling. Duvallon v. Duvallon, 409 So.2d 1162 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). Appellant has not met its heavy burden to demonstrate error in the trial court's decision not to grant a temporary injunction.

Accordingly, we affirm the order denying appellant's amended motion for temporary injunction.

AFFIRMED.

LETTS, C.J., and GLICKSTEIN and DELL, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.