Travelers Indemnity Company v. Dana
Cases that cite this one
6 later published cases cite this decision.
- Amos v. Allstate Insurance Co. (Alaska 2008)
- NATL. FOUND. LIFE INS. CO. v. Wellington (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)
- National Foundation Life Insurance Co. v. Wellington (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)
- Nu-Air Manufacturing Company v. Frank B. Hall & Co. Of New York (11th Cir. 1987)
- Nu-Air Manufacturing Co. v. Frank B. Hall & Co. (11th Cir. 1987)
- WJA Realty Ltd. Partnership v. Employee Benefit Claims, Inc. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
The TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, Appellant,
v.
Rose DANA and Sharon Dana, Appellees.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Joseph A. McGowan, Miami, for appellant.
Preddy, Kutner & Hardy and Howard K. Cherna, Miami, for appellees.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Where, as here, the insured was injured after the past-due premium had been paid to the insurer, and there was evidence to support the trial court's finding that the insurer retained the past-due premium and was thus estopped to deny coverage, the judgment for the insured will be affirmed. See Mixson v. Allstate Insurance Company, 388 So.2d 608 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). Cf. Travelers Indemnity Company of Rhode Island v. Mirlenbrink, 345 So.2d 417 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977) (no estoppel where accident for which coverage is sought occurs before payment of past-due premium).
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.